Skip to main content

Table 3 Computation times (seconds) for obtaining the Pareto fronts shown in Figures 4, 5 and 6 on an Intel® Core TM i7 Processor 4 GHz iMac. Comparison, on forest with different structure or number of stands, between the weighting method and the NSGA-II with a population size of P=200 individuals and different number of generations (G)

From: Simultaneous optimization of even flow and land and timber value in forest planning: a continuous approach

 

Weighting

NSGA-II

 

method

  

Real forest (51 stands)

14

296

(G=500)

Simulated young forest (51 stands)

9

302

(G=500)

Simulated forest with 204 stands

36

1171

(G=500)

  

5405

(G=2000)

Simulated forest with 1632 stands

449

39594

(G=2000)