Skip to content

Advertisement

Forest Ecosystems

Forest Ecosystems Cover Image
Research
Open Access

Growth and yield of Solanum khasianum in Pinus roxburghii forest based silvi-medicinal system in mid hills of Indian Himalaya

  • Chandra Shekher Sanwal1,
  • Raj Kumar2Email author,
  • Raheel Anwar3,
  • Vijaysinha Kakade2,
  • Sushma Kerketta4 and
  • S. D. Bhardwaj4
Forest Ecosystems20163:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-016-0078-3

©  The Author(s). 2016

Received: 6 February 2016

Accepted: 2 August 2016

Published: 12 August 2016

Abstract

Background

In mid hills of Western Himalayas, Himachal Pradesh India, growth, yield and economics of Solanum khasianum as a potential medicinal herb under Pinus roxburghii (Chir pine) plantation has been studied for two consecutive years to assess the performance of Solanum khasianum in undercanopy of Pinus roxburghii for developing Solanum khasianum and Pinus roxburghii based innovative silvi-medicinal system.

Methods

Growth parameters such as plant height, number of branches per plant and leaf area index followed by yield were estimated after Solanum khasianum was grown on three topographical aspects as; Northern, North - western and Western at a spacing of 45 cm × 45 cm, followed by three tillage depths as; minimum (0 cm), medium (up to 10 cm) and deep tillage (up to 15 cm), in open and below canopy conditions treatment. The study was conducted to explore the possibility of using Solanum khasianum based silvi-medicinal system to utilize the below canopy of Chir pine forest for enhancing the productivity of forests besides the conservation of the medicinal herb.

Results

The growth parameters such as plant height, number of branches per plant and leaf area index were non-significantly affected by topographical aspects and tillage practices, both below canopy and open conditions except fresh weight and dry weight of berries during harvesting stage. The maximum yield (0.61 t∙ha−1) was observed on Western aspect in open conditions as compared to below canopy of Chir pine. The highest gross returns were observed for the crop cultivated on Western aspect under deep tillage in open conditions than other aspect and tillage combinations. However the positive net returns from the crops raised in below canopy of Chir pine indicates its possible economic viability under agroforestry system as the gross returns was higher than the cost of cultivation.

Conclusion

Solanum khasianum when grown in below canopy of Pinus roxburghii, its growth and yield indicated positive net returns. Solanum khasianum and Pinus roxburghii based silvi-medicinal system has the potential to enhance the overall productivity of Chir pine forest. This silvi-medicinal system gives scope for utilizing floor Chir pine forests for growth and production of Solanum khasianum beside conservation of the medicinal herb.

Keywords

Bio-economic evaluationSilvi-medicinal systemInter-specific competitionTopographical aspectTillage depthLeaf area index (LAI)

Introduction

Almost all the medicinal plants collected either legally or illegally all over the Himalayas or even other parts of Asia for various purposes are collected from the natural plant communities and only a few species are cultivated (Uniyal et al. 2002). The loss or degradation of forest and grasslands worldwide has led to the shrinking habitat of medicinal plants in almost every country. As a result of which number of medicinal herbs are depleting rapidly from natural plant communities and are threatened with extinction. There are numbers of studies and survey reports those have indicated that over exploitation of several of these medicinal plants for economic gain has rendered them as endangered or vulnerable species (Behrens 2001). The regeneration, protection and preservation of the medicinal plants are a serious challenge for restoring our biological heritage (Hamilton 2004). The future of hundreds of plants species used for medicinal purposes which once grew abundantly in our forest and elsewhere are at a risk, as they often are exploited indiscriminately from the wild, leaving little scope for their regeneration. Another reason for the disappearance of many species is ignorance on our part with regard to the knowledge on identification and use of such species. One of them is Solanum khasianum Clarke, a stout, much branched, under shrub with almost straight prickles which is found in the wastelands, ravines and in the North-Eastern hills of India and the upper Gangetic plains up to an altitude of 1600 m. This species is an important medicinal plant that contains solasodine as a secondary metabolite (Maiti et al. 1979). Glycoalkaloid, solasodine, is found in mature berries of the plant which has great pharmacological importance in the synthesis of steroids (Trivedi and Pundarikakshudu 2007) and used for the treatments of asthma, inflammatory disorders, sex hormones imbalance and as oral contraceptives (Maiti et al. 1979). Consumption of this herbal medicine is increasing worldwide day by day and harvesting from the wild as a raw material causing loss of genetic diversity and habit destructions (Canter et al. 2005; Julsing et al. 2007). Therefore need was felt to regenerate and conserve it in the wild (Sanwal et al. 2011). Hence considering the socio-economic importance of Solanum khasianum for human health and well beings, a field trial was conducted for two consecutive years (2006–07, 2007–08) to assess its regeneration and conservation potential under the Chir pine plantations in its local habitat. Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii), which is closely related to Canary Island pine, Turkish pine and Maritime pine, is one of the most important timber species in the mountain subtropical region of India. It is typically gregarious, indigenous to India, forming extensive natural pure stands, though occur mixed with some broad leaf species at its upper and lower limits (Troup 1921), covering an area of 3853 km2 in Himachal Pradesh (IFS, 2002). The species has a wide adaptability, less demanding of nutrient rich soil than other conifer. Chir pine, like other pine also subject to influence of biotic and abiotic factors, and changing climatic conditions (Kumar et al. 2013; Khaki et al. 2015; Kumar et al. 2016a; Kumar et al. 2016b). But the Chir pine forests have very less or no undercanopy vegetation and hence the productivity of these forests is very low. So keeping in view the vast area under Pinus roxburghii in India and also the greater demand for this medicinal herb, the present study were undertaken to assess the possibility of regenerating Solanum khasianum in undercanopy of Pinus roxburghii for developing innovative Solanum khasianum and Pinus roxburghii based silvi-medicinal system in mid hills of western Himalayas. Thus the experiment was conducted to sustainably utilize the unutilized floor of Chir pine forest while assessing the growth, yield and economics of Solanum khasinaum as a potential medicinal herb in below canopy of Chir pine for its commercial exploitation and conservation.

Methods

Study area

The investigations were carried out at different aspects in Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni Solan, Himachal Pradesh (Fig. 1) at an elevation of 1250 m above mean sea level (30°51’ N latitude and 76°11’ E longitude). The climate of the area is transitional between subtropical to sub-temperate with maximum temperatures was recorded 37.8 °C during summer. June was the hottest month, whereas December was the coldest month with mean annual temperature was recorded 19.8 °C. The annual rainfall ranges between 800–1300 mm of which 75 per cent is received during mid June to mid September. The soil type is incept sols and typic entrochrepts with gravely sandy loam texture. The parent material consists of sand stone, conglomerate, boulders, dolomite and calcareous.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Location map of the study area

Experiment technique and statistical analysis

Seedlings of Solanum khasianum procured from nursery, were used for the transplantation in the planting site at the spacing of 45 cm × 45 cm. Generally it does not require any fertilizer and irrigation practices as the herb is well adapted to the waste lands. Weeding as one of the cultural operations carried out for better growth and yield of the Solanum khasianum. The seedlings were transplanted during monsoons (June–July) and berries harvested at the end of winter season. Solanum khasianum grown under Chir pine canopy and in open conditions on different aspects and under different tillage practices were studied separately to assess former’s growth and yield. Hence, studies involved three factors i.e. Aspects, tillage practices and systems. Solanum khasianum was grown on three aspects such as; Northern, North-Western and Western at a spacing of 45 cm × 45 cm adopting recommended cultural practices, followed by three tillage depths such as; minimum (T1: 0 cm), medium (T2: up to 10 cm) and deep tillage (T3: up to 15 cm) in open conditions and under canopy of Chir pine plantations. The 18 treatments combinations, including all possible combination of three aspects, three tillage depths and two systems were evaluated for growth, yield and economics of Solanum khasianum using three replicates in factorial randomized block design. The entire data generated from the present investigation were analyzed statistically using the technique of analysis of variance for factorial randomized block design in accordance with the procedure outlined by Gomez and Gomez (1984).

Field preparation and transplanting

The forest floor was cleared from needle by manual laborers who collected the needles heaped on the forest floor and removed before transplanting the seedlings at the site. After removing the pine needles, tillage practices were adopted just before the onset of monsoon. The whole experiment was conducted under rainfed conditions entirely depending on the monsoon rains. Keeping in view the forest site conditions, no irrigation and fertilizer was applied because crop has minimum input requirement. For transplanting of seedlings, nursery was prepared, and at the commencement of monsoon, healthy seedlings of Solanum khasianum were lifted from nursery and transplanted in the experimental field after recording sufficient moisture in the soil during first fortnight of July. Planting was done using a wooden stick with good penetration in the experimental area including in minimum tillage plots area. The crop was harvested in the month of December.

Characteristics of Chir pine stand

The characteristics of Chir pine stand in all aspects in which Solanum khasianum was introduced has been presented in the Table 1. The experiment was conducted under 20 years old plantations of Pinus roxburghii and all plots on different aspects were selected having similar density of tree crop (952 trees∙ha−1). Average volume of tree (Chir pine) was calculated using local volume table based on diameter. Annual increment in volume thus calculated, was then used to estimate returns from tree at the prevailing market price. The same procedure was used for calculating net returns from trees on all the three aspects.
Table 1

Height, diameter, crown area and crown density of chir pine stands on different aspects

Aspect

Height (m)

Diameter (cm)

Crown area (m2)

Crown density

Northern aspect

11.23

19.94

2.99

0.85

North-western aspect

10.22

18.15

2.87

0.75

Western aspect

11.09

19.39

2.98

0.64

Observations recorded

Once the needles were removed from the experimental site, the availability of major nutrient viz., organic carbon, available N, available P and available K were analyzed after harvesting Solanum khasianum (Tables 2 and 3). Effect of tree canopy of Chir pine, topographical aspect and tillage depths on growth parameters of Solanum khasianum (height, number of branches per plant and leaf area index) were recorded after transplanting at vegetative (60 d), pre-bloom (120 d) and harvesting stage (180 d). Leaf area index (LAI) of medicinal herb was measured with the help of pre-calibrated, pre programmed LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer (LICOR-USA) using 45° view cap. Whereas, the data for growth and yield attributes were measured at the time of harvesting. To make the economic appraisal for developing this silvi-medicinal system, the yield of Solanum khasianum was subjected to economic analysis by calculating cost of cultivation, gross and net returns per hectare including the net returns from trees. The cost of cultivation was worked out by adding variable and fixed cost as mentioned in Additional file 1: Table S1. The cost incurred on clearing of forest floor varied with respect to treatments. Generally it was 10–20 % of the total cost of cultivation.
Table 2

Effect of topographical aspect on available nutrient in below canopy and open conditions

Aspect

Organic carbon (%)

N (kgha−1)

P (kgha−1)

K (kgha−1)

Below canopy

Open conditions

Below canopy

Open conditions

Below canopy

Open conditions

Below canopy

Open conditions

A1: Northern

1.32

1.10

323

310

18.3

17.7

298

276

A2: North-western

1.44

1.24

336

323

19.9

19.0

313

292

A3: Western

1.58

1.37

350

340

22.2

20.9

325

314

Mean (S)

1.44

1.24

337

325

20.0

19.0

312

249

CD0.05 (A)

0.01

NS

0.07

NS

SEm± (A)

0.01

2.54

0.03

4.70

CD0.05 (S)

0.01

2.98

0.04

5.50

SEm ± (S)

0.01

1.46

0.02

2.71

Table 3

Effect of tillage practices on available nutrients in below canopy and open conditions

Tillage

Organic carbon (%)

N (kgha−1)

P (kgha−1)

K (kgha−1)

Below canopy

Open conditions

Below canopy

Open conditions

Below canopy

Open conditions

Below canopy

Open conditions

T1: Minimum

1.42

1.22

330

320

19.5

18.7

307

292

T2: Medium

1.45

1.24

337

326

20.3

19.2

313

295

T3: Deep

1.46

1.25

342

329

20.6

19.4

316

296

Mean(S)

1.46

1.24

337

325

20.1

19.1

312

249

CD0.05 (T)

0.01

NS

0.06

NS

SEm± (T)

0.01

2.54

0.03

4.68

CD0.05 (S)

0.01

2.98

0.04

5.50

SEm ± (S)

0.01

1.46

0.02

2.71

Results

Effect of tree canopy

Plant height (cm) was significantly affected at vegetative stage, pre- bloom stage and harvest stage, but it was recorded more outside tree canopy (open) than below tree canopy (Fig. 2). Number of branches per plant and leaf area index revealed no significant affect below and outside tree canopy. Similarly, yield (Dry weight of berries) (tha−1) significantly decreased (35.72 %) below tree canopy than outside tree canopy (Fig. 2).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Plant height (a), no. of branches per plant (b), leaf area index (c) and dry wt. of berries (d) below and outside tree canopy (Error bar indicates standard error of the mean)

Effect of topographical aspect

Plant height (cm) significantly differed with changing aspect at vegetative, pre-bloom and harvest stage (Fig. 3). Values of leaf area and leaf area index were also significantly affected on different aspects at vegetative, pre-bloom and harvest stage. Similarly, yield (Dry weight of berries) (tha−1) significantly varied with different aspect and higher yield of these was recorded on Western aspect than on North-Western and Northern aspect, respectively (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Plant height (a), no. of branches per plant (b), leaf area index (c) and dry wt. of berries (d) in Northern, North-west and Western aspect (Error bar indicates standard error of mean)

Effect of tillage

Tillage significantly affected plant height (cm) at vegetative, pre-bloom and harvesting stage and higher plant height (cm) was observed in deep tillage than medium and minimum tillage at all the growth stages (Table 4). Leaf area and leaf area index also varied significantly with different tillage practices. The yield was significantly affected by deep tillage (Dry weight of berries) (tha−1) and highest yield was obtained in deep tillage than other tillage practices (Table 5).
Table 4

Effect of tillage practices on plant height and number of branches per plant of Solanum khasianum

Tillage

Plant height (cm)

Number of branches per plant

Vegetative stage

Pre-bloom stage

Harvesting stage

Minimum

13.02c ± 2.54

19.15a ± 6.87

30.61a ± 6.49

5.83a ± 0.85

Medium

16.67b ± 3.65

23.16a ± 5.98

38.53a ± 7.59

6.87a ± 1.15

Deep

19.34a ± 3.42

26.36a ± 6.59

43.54a ± 8.67

8.37a ± 1.35

Value (±) followed by mean indicates standard deviation of mean; Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.

Table 5

Effect of tillage practices on leaf area index and yield of Solanum khasianum

Tillage

Leaf area index (LAI)

Yield (Dry weight of berries) (qha−1)

Minimum

1.63a ± 0.45

0.38c ± 0.08

Medium

1.77a ± 0.56

0.43b ± 0.06

Deep

2.19a ± 0.61

0.57a ± 0.12

Value (±) followed by mean indicates standard deviation of mean; Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.

Economics of silvi-medicinal systems

The bio-economic appraisal of Solanum khasianum was undertaken to ascertain its economic viability. The total cost of cultivation of Solanum khasianum was found to vary with different treatment combinations. The maximum net returns were observed for crop growing on western aspect under deep tillage in open conditions followed by the crops cultivated on western aspect under deep tillage in undercanopy (Table 6). The minimum net returns were obtained for crop growing on western aspect under minimum tillage in below canopy conditions. In all different treatment combinations, higher net returns were observed in open than below canopy conditions.
Table 6

Bio-economic appraisal of Solanum khasianum ($ha−1)

Treatment combination

Gross return ($)

Cost of cultivation ($)

Net return ($)

A1T1S1

171.33

123.33

47.98

A1T2S1

188.83

141.67

47.17

A1T3S1

213.83

151.63

62.20

A1T1S0

222.50

142.37

80.13

A1T2S0

232.50

157.55

74.95

A1T3S0

312.50

173.43

139.07

A2T1S1

174.35

130.22

44.13

A2T2S1

216.85

147.05

69.80

A2T3S1

294.35

162.05

132.30

A2T1S0

242.50

153.42

89.08

A2T2S0

255.00

168.93

86.07

A2T3S0

335.00

185.03

149.97

A3T1S1

192.55

149.05

43.50

A3T2S1

242.55

161.98

80.55

A3T3S1

335.05

179.70

155.35

A3T1S0

265.00

170.03

94.97

A3T2S0

285.00

188.35

96.65

A3T3S0

365.00

207.05

157.95

1 dollar is equivalent to 60 INR

A 1  = Northern aspect, A2 = North-Western aspect, A3 = Western aspect, T1 = Minimum tillage, T2 = Medium tillage, T3 = Deep tillage, S1 = Below canopy, S0 = Open

Discussion

The production potential of Solanum khasianum can be judged by the effect of different aspect, tillage and systems on growth parameters and final yield.

Effect of tree canopy

Plant growth and yield parameter of Solanum khasianum was generally higher outside tree canopy than below tree canopy (Fig. 2). However the higher values for all growth parameters and yield attributes of Solanum khasianum outside tree canopy suggests that the plants grown outside tree canopy as sole crop has better opportunities to reap more solar energy for photosynthetic activity, less intra-specific competition for critical resources like water, nutrients, and photo synthetically active radiation. These favorable factors seem to result in higher values of growth and yield parameters of Solanum khasianum outside tree canopy conditions. Chauhan (2000), Karikalan et al. (2002), Lott et al. (2000), Okorio (2000) and Singh et al. (2012a) have earlier made similar observations for different agricultural crop and grasses under agroforestry systems. Apart from above the lower values of growth parameters and yield attributes of Solanum khasianum in below canopy of Chir pine might be because of allelopathic effect of tree on crops. Some of the previous study had shown allelopathic effect of Chir pine on different plants (Singh and Verma 1988; Gupta et al. 2007; Aliloo et al. 2012; Sharma 2013a; Sharma 2013b). The findings of this investigation are also in agreement with the earlier findings of many researchers (William and Gordon 1995; Jose et al. 2000; Singh et al. 2012b) who have reported higher production of dry matter in the outside tree canopy than in the intercropped field.

Effect of topographical aspect

Our result showed the growth and yield parameters observed on Western aspect was greater than North-west and Northern aspect (Fig. 3). On the other hand, Nevo et al. (1999) found that plant cover may reach 150 % on the Northern aspect. Nevo et al. (2000) also confirmed that species inhabit on different aspect display genetic, morphologic, physiological and behavioral adaptive complexes in relation to each of the aspect. The maximum growth and yield of Solanum khasianum on Western aspect was attributed to higher intensity of light during forenoon when the temperature is more favourable and leaves remain turgid which limit rate of photosynthesis. On the other hand Northern aspect receiving lower intensity of light in afternoon when the temperature is less favourable and leaves remain less turgid thereby reducing photosynthetic efficiency of the crop on this aspect. Similar findings were observed when Mucuna pruriens and Andrographis paniculata showed highest yield when cultivated on Western aspect (Sanwal et al. 2013, 2015 and Chandra et al. 2016). Nevo (1997) also proved that microclimatic conditions on the aspects vary dramatically, affecting the biology of plants at all levels.

Effect of tillage

In our study, plant growth and yield parameter in deep tillage was recorded more than medium and minimum tillage (Table 5). Higher values of growth and yield in deep tillage were due to better soil permeability, soil aeration, root penetration and weed control. Similar findings were observed by Sanwal et al. (2013, 2015), when medicinal plants like Mucuna pruriens and Andrographis paniculata showed highest yield when cultivated on deep tillage. These results are in agreement with those of Khan et al. (1999), Iqbal et al. (2005), Keshavarzpour and Rashidi (2008), Rashidi and Keshavarzpour (2008) and Rashidi et al. (2008). Khurshid et al. (2006) also reported that development of roots was better in less compacted soil whereas dense soil markedly reduced root growth. This was attributed to the favorable effect on plant height, number of branches per plant and shoot and biomass yield. Thus the greater value of growth parameter and yield in deep tillage is attributed to the higher infiltration and increased soil depth for moisture storage (Moreno et al. 1997). While the lower yield under minimum tillage is attributed to less favorable condition for shoot and root growth, and less moisture storage and poor soil aeration. Lampurlanes et al. (2002) also reported the reduced shoot growth in compact soil because of the poor root development. The other reason for lower value of growth parameters and yield attributes might be because of poor control on weed growth and less nutrient availability under minimum tillage. Unger and Baumhardt (1999) also reported reduction in yield under no tillage as compared to conventional tillage occurred due to lack of control over the weed population.

Economic analysis

Higher gross returns for Solanum khasianum, in open conditions were due to the fact that in open conditions the gross returns were already higher for the crops to the extent that additional returns from trees in below canopy could not surpass the average returns than open conditions (Table 5). The positive net returns in case of Solanum khasianum may be due to their suitability in the environment given in open conditions and in association with the Chir pine. This finding can be supported by the Harrington et al. (2003) who initiated a research to determine the separate effects of above and below ground competition and needlefall from overstorey pines on below canopy plant performance and found that depending on species the effects of needle fall were positive, negative, or negligible. Besides, the positive net returns in Solanum khasianum were attributed to lower cost of cultivation than gross returns (Table 4). The lower cost of cultivation in the given condition can be attributed to the three times lower rental value of land in below canopy of Chir pine than open conditions as; no fertilizers and irrigation practices and lower cost of planting material as the nursery was prepared for Solanum khasianum (Fig. 4). Thus this feasible sustainable cultivation and conservation of Solanum khasianum can be economically viable only in the waste land like land in association with Chir pine where the opportunity cost is zero (i.e. no alternative use of below canopy land is feasible). This finding can be supported by Chatterjiee et al. (2004) who reported that targeted species like Andrographis paniculata etc. could better flourish on natural ecosystem under in-situ conditions and the conservation and cultivation of these species under controlled cultural practices did not prove to be economically feasible under ex-situ.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Growth of Solanum Khasianum in Chir pine forest

Conclusions

The positive net returns received from Solanum khasianum when recorded in below canopy of Chir pine which indicates the great possibility of economic viability of Solanum khasianum and Chir pine based innovative silvi-medicinal system. Solanum khasianum and Pinus roxburghii based innovative silvi-medicinal system also endeavour to use the unutilized floor of Chir pine forest by associating naturally growing Solanum khasianum to improve the productivity of these forests along with conserving medicinal plants. This study can have potential implications in the Chir pine growing belt of the continent if this innovative silvi-medicinal system is implemented by the local farming community or the state forest department. The combination of Solanum khasianum with Pinus roxburghii will not only ensure regular supplies of medicinal herbs but also their conservation. The findings of the present investigation indicate that raising with Chir pine is a viable option for enhancing the diversification and rise in income from Chir pine forest.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the help and support rendered by forest range officer Mr. Tilak Raj and his team members, Lab staff and Field staff of Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry and Forest products, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P.)-173 230, India.

Authors’ contributions

CSS and SDB conducted research work, while RK and RA, VK and SK were involved in Data analysis and writing manuscript, respectively. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

1) Chandra Shekher Sanwal participated in this research as a doctoral student at Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horiculture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India. Currently he is a member of Indian Forest Service and working as Divisional forest officer, Haldwani forest division, Haldwani Uttrakhand, India.

2) Raj Kumar was a doctoral student at Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horiculture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India. Currently he is working as Scientist, ICAR-IISWC, RC, Vasad, Anand, India.

3) Raheel Anwar was a student perusing his Masters at Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana India.

4) Vijaysinha Kakade was perusing his Masters at Indian agriculture research Institute, New Delhi, India. Currently he is working as Scientist, ICAR-IISWC, RC, Vasad, Anand, India

5) Sushma Kerketta was doctoral student at College of forestry at Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horiculture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.

6) S. D. Bhardwaj was former Dean, College of forestry at Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horiculture and Forestry, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Indian Forest Service, Uttarakhand Forest Department, Haldwani Forest Division, Nainital, India
(2)
ICAR-IISWC, Research Center, Anand, India
(3)
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
(4)
Department of Silviculture and Agroforestry, Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, India

References

  1. Aliloo AA, Shahabivand S, Farjam L, Heravi S (2012) Allelopathic effects of Pine needle extracts on germination and seedling growth of Ryegrass and Kentucky Bluegrass. Adv Environm Biol 6(9):2513–2518Google Scholar
  2. Behrens J (2001) Can the utilisation and conservation of medicinal plants coexist? Eur J Herbal Med 5(3):18–26Google Scholar
  3. Canter PH, Thomas H, Ernst E (2005) Bringing medicinal plants in to cultivation: opportunities and challenges for biotechnology. Trend Biotechnol 23:180–185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandra SS, Raj K, Raheel A, Bhardwaj SD (2016) Performance of Mucuna prurience under Chirpine (Pinus roxburghii) Plantation of Mid Hills of Western Himalayas. Agri Res Tech: Open Access J 1(2):555560Google Scholar
  5. Chatterjiee SK, Craker LE, Simon JE, Jatisatiener A, Lewinsohn E (2004) The future of aromatic and medicinal plants, a proceeding of the 26th International Horticultural congress, Toranto, Canada 11–17 Aug.2002. Acta horticulturae 629:23–29Google Scholar
  6. Chauhan VK (2000) Evaluation and wheat and maize varieties under poplar based agroforestry systems in Paonta Doon Valley. Ph.D. Thesis, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, p 680Google Scholar
  8. Gupta B, Thakur NS, Dass B (2007) Allelopathic effect of leaf leachates of Pinus roxburghii Sargent on seeds of some grasses. Indian Forester 133(7):997–1000Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton AC (2004) Medicinal plants, conservation and livelihoods. Biodiv Conserv 13:1477–1517View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington TB, Dagley CM, Edwards MB (2003) Above and belowground competition from longleaf pine plantations limits performance of reintroduced herbaceous species. Forest Sci 49(5):681–695Google Scholar
  11. Indian Forestry Statistics (2002) Ministry of environmental and forests., Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Iqbal M, Hassan AU, Ali A, Rizwanullah M (2005) Residual effect of tillage and farm manure on some soil physical properties and growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Intl J Agr Biol 7:54–57Google Scholar
  13. Jose S, Gillespe AR, Sseifert JR (2000) Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the mid Western U S A: 2. Competition for water. Agroforestry Syst 48:41–59View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Julsing MK, Quax WJ, Kysar O (2007) The engineering of medicinal plants: prospects and limitation of medicinal biotechnology. Med Plant Biotechnol 3:6Google Scholar
  15. Karikalan TV, Yassin MM, Duvya MP, Gopi D (2002) Effect of intercropping and nitrogen management on growth and yield of medicinal plants under Kapok. Ind J Agroforestry 4:88–93Google Scholar
  16. Keshavarzpour F, Rashidi M (2008) Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris). World Appl Sci J 3:359–364Google Scholar
  17. Khaki BA, Singh VRR, Wani AA, Thakur RK (2015) Effect of forest fire on soil nutrients in blue pine (Pinus wallichiana A.B. JACKSON) ecosystems. Ind For 141(4):355–360Google Scholar
  18. Khan FUH, Tahir AR, Yule IJ (1999) Impact of different tillage practices and temporal factor on soil moisture content and soil bulk density. Intl J Agr Biol 1:163–166Google Scholar
  19. Khurshid K, Iqbal M, Arif MS, Nawaz A (2006) Effect of tillage and mulch on soil physical properties and growth of maize. Intl J Agr Biol 8:593–596Google Scholar
  20. Kumar R, Shamet GS, Mehta H, Alam NM, Kaushal R, Chaturvedi OP, Sharma N, Khaki BA, Gupta D (2016a) Regeneration complexities of Pinus gerardiana in dry temperate forests of Indian Himalaya. Environm Sci Poll Res 23(8):7732–7743View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar R, Shamet GS, Alam NM, Jana C (2016b) Influence of growing medium and seed size on germination and seedling growth of Pinus gerardiana Wall. Compost Sci Utiliz 24(2):94–104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar R, Shamet GS, Avasthe RK, Singh C (2013) Ecology of chilgoza pine (Pinus gerardiana Wall) in dry temperate forests of North West Himalaya. Ecol Environm Conserv 19(4):1063–1066Google Scholar
  23. Lampurlanes J, Angas P, Martinez C (2002) Tillage effects on water storage during fallow, and on barley root growth and yield in two contrasting soils of the semiarid Segarra region in Spain. Soil Till Res 65:207–220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lott JE, Ong CK, Black CR (2000) Long-term productivity of a Grevillea robusta-based overstorey agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. II. Crop growth. Forest Ecol Manage 139:187–201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Maiti PC, Mookherja S, Mathew R, Dan SS (1979) Studies on Indian Solanum alkaloid content and detection of solasodine. Econ Bot 33(1):75–77View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Moreno F, Pelegrin F, Fernandez J, Murillo JM (1997) Soil physical properties, water depletion and crop development under traditional and conservation tillage in southern Spain. Soil Till Res 41:25–42View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Nevo E (1997) Evolution in action across phylogeny caused by microclimatic stresses at “Evolution Canyon”. Theoret Popul Biol 52:231–243View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nevo E, Bolshakova MA, Martyn GI, Musatenko LI, Sytnik KM, Baharav A (2000) Drought and light anatomical adaptive leaf strategies in three woody species by microclimatic selection at “Evolution Canyon”. Israel J Plant Sci 48:33–46Google Scholar
  29. Nevo E, Fragman O, Dafni A, Beiles A (1999) Biodiversity and interslope divergence of vascular plants caused by microclimatic differences at “Evolution Canyon” lower nahal Oren, Mount Carmel, Israel. Israel J Plant Sci 47:49–59View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Okorio J (2000) Light interception and water use in boundary planting agroforestry systems. Ph.D. thesis, Reading University, UK., p 230Google Scholar
  31. Rashidi M, Keshavarzpour F (2008) Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of melon (Cucumis melo). Am-Eur J Agr Environm Sci 3:31–36Google Scholar
  32. Rashidi M, Keshavarzpour F, Gholami M (2008) Effect of different tillage methods on yield and yield components of forage corn. Am-Eur J Agr Environm Sci 3:347–351Google Scholar
  33. Sanwal CS, Sushma, Nilay K (2011) Introduction of medicinal and aromatic plants in Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii) forest of India; a sustainable technique. 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology VI-293-296.Google Scholar
  34. Sanwal CS, Sushma RAL, Khan PA, Pant KS, Bhardwaj SD (2013) Influence of topographical aspect and tillage practices on Kaunch (Mucuna pruriens). Ind J Ecol 40(1):158–160Google Scholar
  35. Sanwal CS, Raheel AL, Khan PA, Pant KS, Bhardwaj SD (2015) Effect of aspect and tillage on growth and yield attributes of Kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata). Ind For 141(2):198–202Google Scholar
  36. Sharma NK (2013a) Allelopathic effect of Pinus Roxburghii bark extract on Phalaris Minor. Intl J Sci Res 2(2):20–21VoGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharma NK (2013b) Allelopathic effect of chir pine needle litter on seedling growth of little seed canary grass. Global Res Analys 2(3):10–11Google Scholar
  38. Singh C, Dhadwal KS, Dhiman RC, Kumar R, Avasthe RK (2012a) Allelopathic effects of paulownia and poplar on wheat and maize crops under agroforestry systems in Doon Valley. Ind For 138(11):986–990Google Scholar
  39. Singh C, Dhadwal KS, Dhiman RC, Kumar R (2012b) Management of degraded bouldery riverbed lands through Paulownia based silvipastoral systems in Doon Valley. Ind For 138(3):243–247Google Scholar
  40. Singh SK, Verma KR (1988) Allelopathic effects of leachates and extracts of Pinus roxburghii on four legumes in Kumaun Himalayas. Ind J Agr Sci 58:412–413Google Scholar
  41. Trivedi P, Pundarikakshudu K (2007) Novel TLC Densitometric method for quantification of solasodine in various Solanum Species, market sample and formulations. Chromatographia 65(3/4):239–243View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Troup RS (1921) The Silviculture of Indian Trees: (Oxford:calaranddon Press) Vol III., pp 785–1195Google Scholar
  43. Unger, P.W. and R.L. Baumhardt. 1999. Factors related to dryland sorghum yield increases: 1937-1997. Agron. J. 91:870-875.Google Scholar
  44. Uniyal SK, Awasthi A, Rawat GS (2002) Current status and distribution of commercially exploited medicinal and aromatic plants in upper Gori valley, Kumaon Himalaya, Uttaranchal. Curr Sci 82:1246–1252Google Scholar
  45. William PA, Gordon AM (1995) Microclimate and soil moisture effect of three intercrops on the rows of a newly planted intercropped plantation. Agrofor Syst 29:285–302View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement