Skip to main content

Table 3 Accuracy comparison between different algorithms for filling pits (unit: m)

From: Cloth simulation-based construction of pit-free canopy height models from airborne LiDAR data

Landscapes

Pit proportion

Raw CHM

Mean

Median

Our algorithm

Hemisphere

10%

0.5428

0.4334

0.308

0.2031

20%

0.7562

0.5391

0.3753

0.2783

30%

0.9329

0.6652

0.5098

0.357

40%

1.0685

0.787

0.6747

0.4248

50%

1.1948

0.9217

0.8752

0.4648

60%

1.2882

1.0299

1.0324

0.5209

On average

0.9639

0.7294

0.6292

0.3748

Cone

10%

1.304

0.7299

0.5077

0.4135

20%

1.8507

1.0731

0.7426

0.4814

30%

2.2675

1.4123

1.0503

0.5753

40%

2.6308

1.7823

1.5198

0.6553

50%

2.9588

2.1623

2.0756

0.7523

60%

3.1292

2.3931

2.4199

0.8503

On average

2.3568

1.5922

1.386

0.6214

  1. Note: The values in bold are the smallest ones in each line