From: Success factors for high-quality oak forest (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) regeneration
 | \( \Pr\ \left(\mathsf{term}\ k\ \mathsf{in}\right) \)(%) | Term importance π (%) |
---|---|---|
fct (Tree competition) | 100 | 62.7 |
sm (Climate quotient Q) | 89.3 | 6.6 |
fct (Competitive vegetation) | 80.1 | 22 |
fct (Fencing) | 34.6 | 7.9 |
sm (Age of oak stand) | 14.3 | 0.2 |
sm (Shrub competition) | 9.6 | 0.4 |
sm (Stand size) | 3.6 | 0 |
fct (Preceding land-use type) | 1.1 | 0 |
fct (Regeneration method) | 0.3 | 0 |
fct (Landscape type) | 0.3 | 0 |
lin (Shrub competition) | 0.3 | 0 |
lin (Canopy layer cover) | 0.3 | 0 |
lin (Age of oak stand) | 0.3 | 0 |
fct (Status of water supply) | 0.3 | 0 |
fct (Status of nutrient supply) | 0.3 | 0 |
sm (Canopy layer cover) | 0.3 | 0 |
lin (Stand size) | 0.3 | 0 |
fct (Browsing) | 0.3 | 0 |
lin (Climate quotient Q) | 0.3 | 0 |
fct (Young growth tending) | 0.3 | 0 |
fct (Site preparation) | 0.3 | 0 |