Skip to main content

Table 6 MEF values for the four models of the different forest types

From: Estimating the productive potential of five natural forest types in northeastern China

MEF

N

Trees

Base model

Base model + Hdom

Base model + climate

Base model + Hdom & climate

Eq. 1

Eq. 2

Eq. 1

Eq. 2

Eq. 1

Eq. 2

Eq. 1

Eq. 2

All

384

30,135

0.938

0.938

0.957

0.954

0.937

0.944

0.957

0.957

Broad-leaved mixed forest

192

15,284

0.945

0.948

0.952

0.961

0.945

0.950

0.952

0.961

Mixed broadleaf-conifer forest

30

2748

0.961

0.959

0.968

0.962

0.929

0.959

0.967

0.964

Mongolian oak forest

92

7097

0.966

0.914

0.966

0.953

0.964

0.919

0.966

0.956

Larch forest

37

2314

0.989

0.980

0.989

0.979

0.989

0.981

0.990

0.981

Birch forest

33

2692

0.963

0.948

0.979

0.945

0.962

0.948

0.979

0.946

  1. Bold numbers indicate the highest MEF value of each equation across all of the models for a given forest type