Table 5 RMSE values for the four models of the different forest types
From: Estimating the productive potential of five natural forest types in northeastern China
Bias | N | Trees | Base Model | Base Model + Hdom | Base Model + Climate | Base Model + Hdom & Climate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eq. 1 | Eq. 2 | Eq. 1 | Eq. 2 | Eq. 1 | Eq. 2 | Eq. 1 | Eq. 2 | |||
All | 384 | 30,135 | 12.761 | 1.651 | 10.572 | 1.426 | 12.837 | 1.572 | 10.556 | 1.373 |
Broad-leaved mixed forest | 192 | 15,284 | 10.652 | 1.382 | 9.950 | 1.198 | 10.598 | 1.351 | 9.941 | 1.191 |
Mixed broadleaf-conifer forest | 30 | 2748 | 17.639 | 1.511 | 17.424 | 1.451 | 16.956 | 1.498 | 11.572 | 1.406 |
Mongolian oak forest | 92 | 7097 | 7.626 | 1.763 | 7.617 | 1.296 | 7.790 | 1.702 | 7.657 | 1.265 |
Larch forest | 37 | 2314 | 5.524 | 0.884 | 5.319 | 0.898 | 5.427 | 0.862 | 5.287 | 0.850 |
Birch forest | 33 | 2692 | 4.928 | 1.043 | 3.688 | 1.065 | 4.996 | 1.042 | 3.669 | 1.061 |