Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary parameters for the 13 woody karst species from southwestern China examined in this study. Minimum leaf water potential (Ψmin, MPa), photosynthetic rate (Pn, μmol∙m− 2∙s− 1), stomatal conductance (gs, mol∙m− 2∙s− 1), leaf specific conductivity (Kl, kg∙m− 1∙MPa− 1∙s− 1), xylem tension at 50% cavitation (Ψ50, MPa), leaf specific conductivity at noon (Klnoon, kg∙m− 1∙MPa− 1∙s− 1), loss percentage of Kl at noon (Loss, %), maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), and hydraulic safety margin (Margin, Mpa) were assessed for each species. Standard errors were shown in parentheses

From: Do karst woody plants control xylem tension to avoid substantial xylem cavitation in the wet season?

Species

Ψ min

P n

g s

K l

Ψ 50

K lnoon a

Loss a

F v /F m

Marginb

Alangium chinense ssp. chinense

−1.50 (0.25)

10.55 (1.24)

0.38 (0.10)

6.06 (1.13)

−1.08 (0.23)

1.94

67.95

0.75 (0.01)

−0.42

Carpinus pubescens

− 0.99 (0.32)

6.90 (2.96)

0.23 (0.08)

2.68 (0.88)

−1.39 (0.15)

1.77

33.82

0.78 (0.02)

0.4

Daphniphyllum oldhami

−1.12 (0.21)

4.05 (0.71)

0.11 (0.03)

0.91 (0.32)

−0.62 (0.08)

0.09

89.84

0.79 (0.01)

−0.5

Ficus benguetensis

−1.15 (0.62)

5.12 (0.23)

0.13 (0.05)

2.17 (1.27)

−0.66 (0.09)

0.42

80.68

0.80 (0.01)

−0.49

Itea chinensis

−0.99 (0.18)

7.46 (1.65)

0.14 (0.02)

1.40 (0.49)

−2.54 (0.26)

1.38

1.39

0.76 (0.02)

1.55

Lindera communis

−0.98 (0.06)

9.86 (0.53)

0.21 (0.01)

0.51 (0.21)

−0.85 (0.12)

0.20

60.13

0.79 (0.02)

−0.13

Lithocarpus glaber

−1.08 (0.18)

9.71 (3.79)

0.17 (0.12)

1.70 (0.53)

−1.57 (0.32)

1.16

31.69

0.81 (0.01)

0.49

Ligustrum lucidum

−1.09 (0.16)

11.49 (1.23)

0.32 (0.15)

1.44 (0.19)

−3.67 (0.60)

1.13

21.37

0.80 (0.01)

2.58

Mallotus japonicus var. floccosus

−1.61 (0.23)

7.03 (0.66)

0.34 (0.12)

3.53 (0.63)

−1.12 (0.12)

0.95

73.19

0.77 (0.03)

−0.49

Platycarya longipes

−1.07 (0.19)

10.71 (0.82)

0.31 (0.05)

2.46 (0.55)

−1.50 (0.04)

1.59

35.56

0.76 (0.01)

0.43

Picrasma quassioides

−1.38 (0.05)

10.49 (0.66)

0.30 (0.08)

5.60 (0.49)

−0.93 (0.13)

0.20

87.84

0.77 (0.01)

−0.77

Stachyurus obovatus

−0.96 (0.56)

5.42 (2.09)

0.14 (0.03)

0.86 (0.19)

−4.31 (0.39)

0.74

14.07

0.80 (0.02)

3.35

Sapium sebiferum

−1.42 (0.31)

10.37 (1.71)

0.23 (0.02)

4.52 (0.82)

−0.65 (0.08)

0.45

90.07

0.84 (0.02)

−0.77

  1. a, calculated using laboratory-generated vulnerability curve and field water potential measurements.b, calculated as the difference between Ψ50 and minimum water potential