Skip to main content

Table 9 Stand–level projection mean bias (MB; observed – predicted), root mean square error (RMSE), and percent bias (%Bias) for total stem density (# ha–1), quadratic mean diameter (QMD; cm), and basal area (m2∙ha–1) by tree mortality method and forest, which are Dubuar Memorial Forest (DMF), Huntington Wildlife Forest (HWF), Pack Demonstration Forest (PDF), Pack Experimental Forest (PEF), and Shirley Forest (SF)

From: Development and evaluation of an individual tree growth and yield model for the mixed species forest of the Adirondacks Region of New York, USA

Forest

N

Years simulated (min – max)

Stem density

QMD

Basal area

MB

RMSE

%Bias

MB

RMSE

%Bias

MB

RMSE

%Bias

Expansion Factor method

 DMF

10

8.9 (7 – 17)

6.69

64.18

5.00

–0.29

1.47

–0.90

–0.28

3.10

1.22

 HWF

59

20.1 (10 – 31)

174.81

214.62

30.08

–3.21

5.83

–10.64

5.31

7.04

18.19

 PDF

71

10.0 (10 – 10)

130.67

188.45

13.95

–0.98

1.85

–4.41

0.80

3.79

0.70

 PEF

2

8.5 (7 – 10)

87.72

89.38

17.85

–1.34

1.49

–4.98

2.59

3.21

9.04

 SF

103

8.7 (3 – 24)

22.06

48.47

6.39

–0.11

1.54

–0.59

0.81

2.38

4.39

 Overall

245

11.8 (3 – 31)

90.23

150.35

14.32

–1.13

3.20

–4.17

1.86

4.35

6.55

Optimal Cutpoint method

 DMF

10

8.9 (7 – 17)

–18.53

77.85

–1.01

–0.28

1.46

–0.86

–1.54

3.93

–4.03

 HWF

59

20.1 (10 – 31)

74.97

136.73

12.48

–2.97

5.67

–9.96

–1.09

5.28

–1.81

 PDF

71

10.0 (10 – 10)

58.82

143.28

5.84

–0.96

1.83

–4.29

–1.39

4.09

–4.99

 PEF

2

8.5 (7 – 10)

49.42

55.25

10.13

–1.30

1.47

–4.86

–0.19

0.35

–1.16

 SF

103

8.7 (3 – 24)

–5.64

53.52

–0.32

–0.08

1.55

–0.48

–0.51

2.83

–0.85

 Overall

245

11.8 (3 – 31)

32.38

109.22

4.61

–1.05

3.14

–3.92

–0.95

3.94

–2.42