Table 4 Efficiency of different silvicultural systems and management plans when all plans of a certain region were included in the same data envelopment analysis (DEA)
From: Which type of forest management provides most ecosystem services?
Management plan | South | Central | North |
|---|---|---|---|
Max NPV 2 %, RFM | 0.940 | 0.912 | 0.944 |
Max NPV 2 %, CCF | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Max NPV 2 %, AAF | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Max NPV 5 %, RFM | 0.976 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Max NPV 5 %, CCF | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Max NPV 5 %, AAF | 0.994 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Max NPV 2 %, RFM, Equal removal | 0.961 | 0.938 | 0.936 |
Max NPV 2 %, CCF, Equal removal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Max NPV 2 %, AAF, Equal removal | 0.985 | 0.984 | 0.967 |
Max NPV 5 %, RFM, Equal removal | 1.000 | 0.981 | 0.909 |
Max NPV 5 %, CCF, Equal removal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Max NPV 5 %, AAF, Equal removal | 1.000 | 0.992 | 0.960 |
Multi 2 %, RFM, Equal removal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Multi 2 %, CCF, Equal removal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Multi 2 %, AAF, Equal removal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Multi 5 %, RFM, Equal removal | 1.000 | 0.999 | 1.000 |
Multi 5 %, CCF, Equal removal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Multi 5 %, AAF, Equal removal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.994 |